Collective Review
Efficient and manageable direct assessment is now possible.
Simplify, streamline and scale program and institution-level assessment. Easily gather, store and distribute artifacts for anonymous review with randomized sampling and customizable juried assessment workflows to ensure unbiased assessments. Measure and understand outcomes with insightful, reusable, shareable results.
Collective Review
- Easier work collection
- Configurable assessment workflows
- Truly randomized selections
- Student progress monitoring
- Flexible reporting
- Optional juried assessments
Quality, stress-free artifact collection and distribution
Simplify artifact collection through bulk import and direct user upload. Compile work samples from a single program or across your entire institution and upload virtually any type of digital content for assessment of program, gen-ed or institutional outcomes.
Match your workflow needs without changing strategies
Keep your assessment processes intact throughout the term—or at the end—without upending your current progress. Add assessor pools for simultaneous juried assessment, agreement reporting and in-depth analytics on student learning.
Produce, analyze and share with flexible reporting
Craft dynamic reports to analyze student progress by assessment instrument or learning outcome. View student progress-over-time by cohort or program and share results with stakeholders, taking action to close the loop for program improvement and accreditation.
Bolster assessment validity with randomized selections
Reduce bias with an integrated sampling process. The system can automatically determine a statistically valid sample size based on your population and randomly distribute student work for assessment. Use juried assessment and percent agreement reporting to generate the most valid and reliable data to provide workflow flexibility.
Want to discover how Collective Review can help your institution?
“Since the implementation of Collective Review, at least 75% of our assessments are now being rated and reported electronically. This has helped to redeem some of our faculty’s limited time and our University’s personnel resources. Additionally, it is much easier for faculty and the IE office to track rating progress on assessments.”
Timothy FowlerDirector of Assessment
Liberty University
